eClinicalWorks vs Harris CareTracker

The core functionality of eClinicalWorks is suitable for most medical practices and comes at a fair price. However, many users felt that they were oversold on the product by the sales team. Many users complained of difficulty using the features they needed, and felt that the system interface made it difficult to navigate. Users reported issues with system bugs and were unable to receive sufficient support from the support team to rectify the issues they experienced, despite access to 24/7 support. Some users noted that customer support is outsourced and complained that a language barrier made it difficult to communicate. Ultimately, eClinicalWorks is best suited for small practices with basic EHR needs, though it may take users a few days to learn the system.

Many users find it easy to use and navigate, but some have expressed concerns about its performance and support. Harris CareTracker is a popular choice for healthcare providers who are looking for an affordable and user-friendly EHR and practice management solution. Users praise its intuitive interface, which allows them to quickly learn the system and start using it. They also appreciate the wide range of features, including recall management, financing tools, and the ability to access patient information from anywhere. However, some users have reported issues with the software's performance, such as glitches and limitations when working from home. They also find the support to be slow and challenging to deal with. Harris CareTracker is best suited for healthcare providers who are looking for a comprehensive and affordable solution that is easy to use. It is particularly well-suited for small to medium-sized practices that do not have a large IT staff. However, providers who require a highly customizable system or who have a large number of users may want to consider other options.