Looking for alternatives to Cx360? Many users crave user-friendly and feature-rich solutions for tasks like Clinical Charts, Clinical Documentation, and Platform Security and Compliance. Leveraging crowdsourced data from over 1,000 real EHR Software selection projects based on 400+ capabilities, we present a comparison of Cx360 to leading industry alternatives like EpicCare, Practice Fusion, Nextech, and athenahealth.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
Cx360 is an integrated cloud-based platform for organizations that provide support for developmental disabilities, mental health and substance abuse services. It also provides county and state governments with a single workspace to manage their human and health services needs. It maximizes security, flexibility and scalability to improve outcomes, reduce costs and increase access between payers, consumers and providers.
It has a consumer-centric interface that simplifies the HHS experience from end-to-end, delivering excellent care coordination, improving consumer engagement and streamlining the reimbursement process. It permits providers to improve throughput by checking the availability of employee resources and communicating seamlessly with patients.
Practice Fusion is a comprehensive software solution designed to streamline electronic health records (EHR) management and other essential tasks for healthcare providers. It is particularly well-suited for small to medium-sized medical practices due to its user-friendly interface and robust functionality. The software offers significant benefits, including improved patient care coordination, enhanced data accuracy, and efficient workflow management.
Popular features of Practice Fusion include customizable charting, e-prescribing, patient scheduling, and billing integration. Users often appreciate its intuitive design and the ability to access patient information quickly and securely. Compared to similar products, Practice Fusion is frequently praised for its ease of use and affordability, making it an attractive option for practices with limited resources.
Pricing for Practice Fusion typically falls within a moderate range, often based on a per-provider, per-month model, which allows for predictable budgeting. This payment structure ensures that practices can scale their usage according to their needs without incurring prohibitive costs.
among all EHR Software
EpicCare has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 85% when considering 1148 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Practice Fusion has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 75% when considering 461 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Nextech has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 79% when considering 318 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
athenahealth has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 75% when considering 953 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Does Cx360 give you a full 360-degree view of your patients' needs? Cx360 EHR generally receives positive reviews for its comprehensive features tailored to behavioral health and human services. Users praise its customizable workflows, robust reporting capabilities, and integrated billing system. The platform's user interface is frequently lauded as intuitive, making it easy for new users to get up to speed. For example, one user, a care coordinator, highlighted the ease of searching for clients. However, this same user found it challenging to navigate and locate client information, stating the facesheet lacked sufficient detail. This suggests that while the platform excels in some areas, certain aspects might require improvement for a truly seamless user experience. Overall, Cx360 EHR appears well-suited for organizations in the behavioral health sector seeking a user-friendly platform with comprehensive features.
Many users love the robust functionality offered by EpicCare and find that the shortcut options allow them to navigate the system with ease. It also provides greater transparency into patient data, allowing care providers at separate facilities to access patient records with ease. However, the system’s expansive capabilities are overwhelming for many users, and a significant number of users struggled to use shortcuts correctly. The majority of reviewers commented that the system is difficult to navigate, experiences frequent downtime, offers minimal support and comes at a prohibitively high cost. Despite the negative tone of many reviews, nearly 100% of reviewers noted that they would recommend this system to a colleague, recognizing EpicCare as a leader in the EHR software space.
User reviews from the past year paint a mixed picture. While some users praise its intuitive design and comprehensive features, others express frustration with its customer support and pricing. Practice Fusion stands out for its user-friendly interface, which makes navigating the system a breeze, especially for those new to electronic health records. Its robust feature set, including charting, e-prescribing, and billing, caters to a wide range of practice needs. However, some users report encountering difficulties with customer support, finding it unresponsive and unhelpful. Additionally, pricing concerns have been raised, with some users finding the system expensive compared to competitors like Athenahealth or Kareo. Overall, Practice Fusion seems best suited for smaller practices seeking a user-friendly, all-in-one EHR solution. However, practices with more complex needs or those prioritizing responsive customer support might want to explore alternative options.
Nextech, a comprehensive practice management solution designed to streamline workflows for specialty practices, has elicited a range of feedback from users over the past year. While opinions on the platform's efficacy vary, several recurring themes emerge from user reviews, shedding light on its strengths, weaknesses, and ideal user base. Nextech's robust features and customizability are frequently cited as major advantages. Users appreciate the platform's ability to adapt to the specific needs of different specialties, with tools for appointment scheduling, billing, and electronic health records (EHR) management. The platform's integration with other software systems is also highlighted as a strength, enabling seamless data exchange and reducing manual data entry. However, some users find the extensive customization options overwhelming, leading to a steep learning curve and implementation challenges. Nextech's EHR functionality receives mixed reviews. Some users praise its comprehensive features, such as charting, e-prescribing, and patient portal access. Others express concerns about the EHR's user interface, citing issues with navigation and data entry. Additionally, while Nextech offers a mobile app, its functionality is limited compared to the desktop version, which can be inconvenient for users who require on-the-go access. In comparison to similar products, Nextech stands out for its specialization in serving the needs of specialty practices. Its features and workflows are tailored to address the unique challenges faced by these practices, such as complex billing requirements and specialized clinical documentation. This focus on specialty practices differentiates Nextech from more generic practice management solutions. Considering its strengths and weaknesses, Nextech appears best suited for larger specialty practices with dedicated IT resources and a willingness to invest time in implementation and training. The platform's extensive features and customizability can provide significant value to these practices, but may overwhelm smaller practices with limited resources.
User reviews paint a compelling picture of athenaOne's strengths and weaknesses. Many users laud its intuitiveness and efficiency, comparing it favorably to Epic in particular. "Charting a patient in athenaOne takes half the time compared to Epic," one user shared, highlighting the streamlined interface. Another user raved about the integrated functionalities, stating, "The way athenaOne links billing and scheduling saves us so much time compared to our previous system, which kept everything siloed." However, some users expressed frustrations with limited customization options and occasional hiccups in customer support. "I wish athenaOne offered more granular control over customizing templates and workflows like you can in Epic," commented one user, seeking greater personalization. Another mentioned, "Customer support can be a mixed bag. While they're sometimes helpful and prompt, I've also had experiences with long wait times and inconsistent responses." Overall, user reviews suggest athenaOne shines in user-friendliness, comprehensive features, and workflow efficiency, rivaling even industry giants like Epic in these aspects. While some limitations around customization and support exist, athenaOne remains a strong contender in the EHR market, offering a user-friendly and feature-rich experience for healthcare providers looking to optimize their practice operations.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...