athenahealth vs Modernizing Medicine

User reviews paint a compelling picture of athenaOne's strengths and weaknesses. Many users laud its intuitiveness and efficiency, comparing it favorably to Epic in particular. "Charting a patient in athenaOne takes half the time compared to Epic," one user shared, highlighting the streamlined interface. Another user raved about the integrated functionalities, stating, "The way athenaOne links billing and scheduling saves us so much time compared to our previous system, which kept everything siloed." However, some users expressed frustrations with limited customization options and occasional hiccups in customer support. "I wish athenaOne offered more granular control over customizing templates and workflows like you can in Epic," commented one user, seeking greater personalization. Another mentioned, "Customer support can be a mixed bag. While they're sometimes helpful and prompt, I've also had experiences with long wait times and inconsistent responses." Overall, user reviews suggest athenaOne shines in user-friendliness, comprehensive features, and workflow efficiency, rivaling even industry giants like Epic in these aspects. While some limitations around customization and support exist, athenaOne remains a strong contender in the EHR market, offering a user-friendly and feature-rich experience for healthcare providers looking to optimize their practice operations.

Modernizing Medicine is an easy-to-use and intuitive, all-in-one, specialty-specific EHR. It offers a wide range of integrated solutions, including practical administration, business services, patient engagement tools and analytics. The EMA platform keeps users informed and saves time, increasing productivity. The integrated practice management system can check patient eligibility prior to appointments, identify time slots according to individual requirements and provide further steps, details of follow-up care, and recommendations from the provider during check-out. Some reviewers have mentioned that some task processes require too many clicks and can be complex to complete. Full licenses and ongoing support are relatively costly compared to other systems. However, users also said that it gives you what you pay for, as it offers robust functionality.