athenahealth vs Meditech

User reviews paint a compelling picture of athenaOne's strengths and weaknesses. Many users laud its intuitiveness and efficiency, comparing it favorably to Epic in particular. "Charting a patient in athenaOne takes half the time compared to Epic," one user shared, highlighting the streamlined interface. Another user raved about the integrated functionalities, stating, "The way athenaOne links billing and scheduling saves us so much time compared to our previous system, which kept everything siloed." However, some users expressed frustrations with limited customization options and occasional hiccups in customer support. "I wish athenaOne offered more granular control over customizing templates and workflows like you can in Epic," commented one user, seeking greater personalization. Another mentioned, "Customer support can be a mixed bag. While they're sometimes helpful and prompt, I've also had experiences with long wait times and inconsistent responses." Overall, user reviews suggest athenaOne shines in user-friendliness, comprehensive features, and workflow efficiency, rivaling even industry giants like Epic in these aspects. While some limitations around customization and support exist, athenaOne remains a strong contender in the EHR market, offering a user-friendly and feature-rich experience for healthcare providers looking to optimize their practice operations.

Meditech is an intuitive EHR solution to streamline charting, documentation and patient data retrieval. Reviewers found the system simplified to a fault. Users found that it helps keep information neatly and securely organized, resulting in a smooth user experience. Without overwhelming clients, the platform enables ease of use and navigation. It also increases treatment accuracy by predicting diagnosis. However, others complained that its lack of features limited its functionality. It provides minimal charting options. It also lacks an assessment entry field, dot phase or auto-populate preset features. Its notifications are easy to miss. Being a web-based application, it’s not optimized for smartphones or mobile devices. The system can lag when dealing with high volumes. Overall, it’s not a comprehensive solution, but it streamlines clinical workflows with its suite of features.