athenahealth vs iSalus

User reviews paint a compelling picture of athenaOne's strengths and weaknesses. Many users laud its intuitiveness and efficiency, comparing it favorably to Epic in particular. "Charting a patient in athenaOne takes half the time compared to Epic," one user shared, highlighting the streamlined interface. Another user raved about the integrated functionalities, stating, "The way athenaOne links billing and scheduling saves us so much time compared to our previous system, which kept everything siloed." However, some users expressed frustrations with limited customization options and occasional hiccups in customer support. "I wish athenaOne offered more granular control over customizing templates and workflows like you can in Epic," commented one user, seeking greater personalization. Another mentioned, "Customer support can be a mixed bag. While they're sometimes helpful and prompt, I've also had experiences with long wait times and inconsistent responses." Overall, user reviews suggest athenaOne shines in user-friendliness, comprehensive features, and workflow efficiency, rivaling even industry giants like Epic in these aspects. While some limitations around customization and support exist, athenaOne remains a strong contender in the EHR market, offering a user-friendly and feature-rich experience for healthcare providers looking to optimize their practice operations.

User reviews of iSalus from the past year present a mixed bag. While iSalus is lauded by some for its comprehensive features, others find it a bitter pill to swallow due to its clunky interface and intermittent technical hiccups. A standout feature is its all-in-one platform, integrating patient management, billing, and telehealth - a godsend for streamlining workflows. One user lauded the ease of adding new patients and navigating the software compared to other EHR systems. However, the honeymoon phase seems to be short-lived for some, as complaints about freezing screens, an unintuitive interface, and sluggish customer support abound. Some users have even described the system's billing practices as "suspect," which raises serious red flags. Despite these drawbacks, many users appreciate the software's customizability, citing the ability to tailor templates to meet specific documentation needs as a major plus. Ultimately, iSalus seems best suited for those willing to brave the initial learning curve and occasional technical snags in exchange for a feature-rich platform. Smaller practices that prioritize an integrated system over a seamless user experience might find iSalus a good fit.