Infocon Systems vs Cleo Integration Cloud

Is Infocon Systems the real deal or just a lot of hype? User reviews from the last year paint a pretty clear picture: Infocon Systems is a solid EDI solution, especially for those who value simplicity and affordability. Users consistently highlight its user-friendly interface as a major plus, making it easy even for non-technical folks to get the hang of EDI. One user even raved about how much faster their order processing became after switching to Infocon Systems, which is a huge win for any business. This ease of use, combined with its budget-friendly pricing structure, makes it a compelling choice for small to medium-sized businesses that may have found other EDI solutions too complex or expensive.However, no software is perfect, and Infocon Systems is no exception. While there aren't many user reviews highlighting major drawbacks, one user did mention that the software is only compatible with desktop computers. This might be a minor inconvenience for some, but it could be a dealbreaker for businesses that rely heavily on mobile devices. Overall, though, Infocon Systems seems to hit the sweet spot for businesses looking for a straightforward, affordable, and reliable EDI solution. It's like the Toyota Camry of EDI software - it might not be the flashiest option out there, but it gets the job done without breaking the bank.

Cleo Integrated Cloud provides a robust suite of features and communication protocols. Users were satisfied with the accessibility and ease of configuration. The system supports FTP, SFTP and AS2 protocols, and its proxy server enables secure transactions. Users could leverage multiple schemas, such as Json, XML, EDI, Txt, MFT and API for data transformation and integration. Users specifically praised their customer support, mentioning that they take the time to resolve any problems that occur. Users found the system capable of real-time data exchange and processes. It also empowered better collaboration with options to collaborate on projects and numerous preconfigured connections. However, there were mixed reviews when it came to customization, with some claiming that the cloud-based system takes away some control. Some users experienced occasional performance and connectivity issues. Several issues were raised by a few reviewers, including difficulty in troubleshooting, limited reporting and analytics. Overall, it’s a robust application for connection management and mapping.