Our analysts compared Biztalk Server vs DiCentral based on data from our 400+ point analysis of EDI Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all EDI Software
DiCentral has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 83% when considering 635 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
BizTalk Server is a powerful tool for businesses needing a robust and adaptable solution for Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) and application integration. Users appreciate its ability to handle complex data formats and its scalability, making it suitable for large organizations with diverse integration requirements. Its versatility allows for connecting various systems and applications, streamlining business processes. However, some users find BizTalk Server's complexity and steep learning curve to be drawbacks, especially for those seeking a simpler EDI solution. Additionally, while BizTalk Server offers a range of features, it may not be the most cost-effective option for smaller businesses with less complex integration needs. Compared to other integration platforms like MuleSoft Anypoint Platform or Boomi, BizTalk Server stands out with its deep integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, making it a natural choice for organizations heavily invested in Microsoft technologies. Its strength lies in handling complex integrations and orchestrations, but it may not be as user-friendly or cloud-native as some competitors. Ultimately, BizTalk Server is best suited for enterprises requiring a comprehensive and scalable solution for EDI and application integration, particularly those already utilizing Microsoft products and services. Its ability to manage intricate data formats and automate business processes makes it a valuable asset for organizations with complex integration challenges.
Users found DiCentral easy to use and navigate, but its interface confusing and antiquated. It offers a centralized location to handle invoices, track orders and search, filter and consolidate information with integrations. While tech support was knowledgeable and responsive, some users reported having difficulties understanding them. Users reported robust analytics functionality, with predesigned documentation and reports. Several users reported compatibility issues on MAC and several browsers such as Chrome and Firefox. Common performance issues include access prohibition, response delays and late reception of messages. Users also reported flexibility for various requirements. Overall, it is an intuitive system to build secure connections with certain functional limitations.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...