Our analysts compared Maximo vs Sage Fixed Assets based on data from our 400+ point analysis of EAM Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
Sage Fixed Assets is a comprehensive software solution designed to streamline enterprise asset management (EAM) tasks. It excels in tracking, managing, and depreciating fixed assets, making it particularly suitable for mid-sized to large organizations that require meticulous asset oversight. The software's robust capabilities include detailed asset tracking, depreciation calculation, and compliance with tax regulations, which are crucial for businesses with extensive asset portfolios.
Users benefit from its intuitive interface, which simplifies complex asset management processes, and its ability to integrate seamlessly with other financial systems. Popular features include customizable reporting, barcode scanning for physical inventory, and automated depreciation schedules. These features enhance accuracy and efficiency, reducing the risk of errors and ensuring compliance with financial standards.
Compared to similar products, Sage Fixed Assets is praised for its user-friendly design and comprehensive functionality. Pricing details are typically tailored to individual business needs, so it's advisable to contact SelectHub for a personalized quote. This ensures that users receive a solution that fits their specific requirements and budget.
among all EAM Software
Maximo has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 87% when considering 978 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
Sage Fixed Assets has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 82% when considering 79 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Maximo and concluded it deserves the award for the Best Overall EAM Software available today and earns best-in-class honors for Analytics and Reporting, Asset Tracking, Maintenance and Inspection Management and Mobile EAM.
IBM Maximo Asset Management helps users perform preventive repairs to extend asset lifespans, monitor assets and equipment, manage contracts, and control inventory. It excels in asset management, tracking and reports. With an intuitive design, plenty of integrations and a high degree of customization, it provides flexibility and ease so users can get the most out of it. However, the UI can be difficult for new users and the cost for licensing is on the higher end. Reviews also cited difficulty with attachments and a complex implementation process as drawbacks. Overall, it’s a good fit for businesses looking for a CMMS with plenty of features that go far beyond asset management.
Is Sage Fixed Assets the "sage" choice for managing your company's valuable assets? User reviews from the past year reveal a mixed bag. While Sage Fixed Assets is generally praised for its robust features, particularly its comprehensive depreciation calculations and customizable reporting capabilities, some users find it non-intuitive and difficult to navigate. One user, an accountant with a decade of experience using the software, raves about its ability to streamline asset tracking and depreciation calculations, highlighting the customizable asset template as a key strength. Conversely, another user criticizes the asset import system and reporting functionalities, finding them cumbersome and difficult to use. A major differentiating factor is the software's relatively low cost, making it an attractive option for small to mid-sized businesses seeking a quick return on investment. However, this affordability comes at the cost of a steep learning curve, with some features requiring advanced knowledge to utilize effectively. For instance, while the software boasts over 50 depreciation methods and compliance with various accounting standards, setting up and managing these features can be daunting for users without a strong accounting background. Overall, Sage Fixed Assets is most suitable for businesses with dedicated accounting personnel who can invest the time to master its complexities. Smaller organizations or those lacking in-house accounting expertise may find its learning curve too steep and its interface less user-friendly compared to more intuitive, albeit pricier, alternatives.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...