Our analysts compared Maximo vs Cartegraph based on data from our 400+ point analysis of EAM Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all EAM Software
Maximo has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 87% when considering 978 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
Cartegraph has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 95% when considering 63 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Maximo and concluded it deserves the award for the Best Overall EAM Software available today and earns best-in-class honors for Analytics and Reporting, Asset Tracking, Maintenance and Inspection Management and Mobile EAM.
Cartegraph stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
IBM Maximo Asset Management helps users perform preventive repairs to extend asset lifespans, monitor assets and equipment, manage contracts, and control inventory. It excels in asset management, tracking and reports. With an intuitive design, plenty of integrations and a high degree of customization, it provides flexibility and ease so users can get the most out of it. However, the UI can be difficult for new users and the cost for licensing is on the higher end. Reviews also cited difficulty with attachments and a complex implementation process as drawbacks. Overall, it’s a good fit for businesses looking for a CMMS with plenty of features that go far beyond asset management.
Is Cartegraph EAM software the 'carte' blanche solution for asset management, or does it leave users feeling challenged? User reviews from the past year paint a largely positive picture, highlighting Cartegraph's user-friendliness, especially for field staff, and its robust feature set. For instance, users rave about its intuitive interface for managing work orders, tracking assets, and integrating with GIS data, which is crucial for visualizing asset locations and optimizing maintenance routes. However, some users have pointed out a few bumps in the road. The software's comprehensive nature, while a strength in terms of functionality, can make the initial learning curve steep. Additionally, while Cartegraph shines in its GIS integration, integrating it with third-party software can sometimes be a bit of a headache. Some users also wished for more user-friendly reporting features, finding the current system a tad cumbersome for creating custom reports. Overall, Cartegraph EAM software appears to be a robust and user-friendly solution, particularly well-suited for organizations with significant field operations, such as municipalities or utility companies. Its strengths lie in its intuitive interface for field staff, comprehensive asset management capabilities, and seamless GIS integration. However, organizations should be prepared for an initial learning curve and potential challenges with third-party integrations.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...