Looking for alternatives to ManagerPlus? Many users crave user-friendly and feature-rich solutions for tasks like Mobile EAM, Asset Management, and Work Order Management. Leveraging crowdsourced data from over 1,000 real EAM Software selection projects based on 400+ capabilities, we present a comparison of ManagerPlus to leading industry alternatives like Maximo, Oracle EAM, Asset Essentials by Brightly, and WebCheckout.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
Key benefits of Asset Essentials include improved asset visibility, reduced maintenance costs, and enhanced compliance. Its popular features include asset tracking, work order management, and inventory control. Users appreciate its user-friendly interface, customizable dashboards, and mobile accessibility.
Pricing for Asset Essentials is based on a subscription model, with monthly or annual payment options. The price range varies depending on the number of assets managed and the level of support required.
among all EAM Software
ManagerPlus has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 81% when considering 203 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
Maximo has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 87% when considering 978 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
Asset Essentials by Brightly has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 86% when considering 501 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
WebCheckout has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 87% when considering 58 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
User reviews of ManagerPlus in the past year paint a picture of a powerful asset management software with both strengths and weaknesses to consider. Many users praise its centralized dashboard and real-time tracking, providing valuable visibility into asset location, status, and usage. This comprehensive overview, compared to basic asset tracking tools, empowers informed decision-making and proactive maintenance, saving time and resources. Additionally, automated maintenance scheduling and built-in compliance features are highlighted as strengths, streamlining workflows and mitigating risks, which can be advantageous over competitors lacking these functionalities. However, some users mention limited customization options as a drawback. While the interface is generally user-friendly, reports and dashboards might not easily adapt to specific workflows, unlike some competitors offering more flexibility. Additionally, complex features and integrations can require more technical expertise, potentially increasing training needs compared to simpler asset management software. Another point of consideration is pricing. While ManagerPlus offers tiered plans, some users, particularly smaller businesses, find it costlier than basic alternatives. However, its comprehensive feature set and potential return on investment through improved efficiency and cost savings should be weighed against the initial cost. Ultimately, the decision depends on individual needs and budget constraints. In conclusion, ManagerPlus offers a robust suite of features for comprehensive asset management, but its value proposition depends on your specific needs and priorities. Carefully consider its strengths, such as real-time tracking and compliance management, alongside its limitations, like customization rigidity and potential learning curve. Comparing it to similar products based on features, ease of use, and pricing will help you determine if ManagerPlus is the right fit for your asset management goals.
IBM Maximo Asset Management helps users perform preventive repairs to extend asset lifespans, monitor assets and equipment, manage contracts, and control inventory. It excels in asset management, tracking and reports. With an intuitive design, plenty of integrations and a high degree of customization, it provides flexibility and ease so users can get the most out of it. However, the UI can be difficult for new users and the cost for licensing is on the higher end. Reviews also cited difficulty with attachments and a complex implementation process as drawbacks. Overall, it’s a good fit for businesses looking for a CMMS with plenty of features that go far beyond asset management.
User reviews of Oracle EAM paint a picture of a powerful, comprehensive asset management tool that offers significant benefits in terms of streamlined workflows, improved visibility, enhanced collaboration, reduced costs, and increased compliance. However, the software is often criticized for its complex interface, high cost, limited customization options, integration challenges, and lack of robust reporting capabilities. One user highlights the positive impact on efficiency, stating "Oracle EAM has helped us streamline our maintenance processes and reduce administrative tasks by 20%. This allows our team to focus on more strategic initiatives." Another user emphasizes the improved decision-making capabilities, saying "The real-time insights provided by Oracle EAM have given us a much clearer picture of our asset health and performance. This has enabled us to make data-driven decisions about maintenance and investment." Despite these advantages, users frequently cite the steep learning curve and high cost as major drawbacks. One user comments, "The interface is very complex and requires extensive training. This can be a major barrier for small businesses or those with limited resources." Another user laments, "The licensing and implementation fees for Oracle EAM are significant compared to some of its competitors. This can make it a less attractive option for budget-conscious organizations." When compared to similar products, such as SAP and IBM Maximo, users often acknowledge that Oracle EAM offers greater depth and functionality. However, they also emphasize that the complexity comes at the cost of user-friendliness and affordability. One user compares the two, saying "While Oracle EAM is more powerful than SAP, it is also significantly more complex. If you are a large organization with a dedicated IT team, Oracle EAM may be a good option. However, if you are a small business or have limited technical resources, SAP may be a better choice." Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to choose Oracle EAM comes down to a careful consideration of its strengths and weaknesses relative to your specific needs and resources. If you prioritize robust functionality and comprehensive features, Oracle EAM may be a good fit. However, if ease of use and affordability are key concerns, you may want to explore alternative options.
Asset Essentials by Brightly is praised by users for its user-friendly interface, comprehensive asset tracking capabilities, and detailed reporting features. Users appreciate the ability to customize fields and reports to meet their specific needs, as well as the integration with other software such as QuickBooks and Salesforce. Compared to competitors, Asset Essentials is seen as a more affordable and scalable option, with a wider range of features and integrations. One key differentiator is Asset Essentials' mobile app, which allows users to access and update asset information on the go. This is particularly valuable for businesses with remote or field-based employees. Additionally, the software's ability to generate QR codes for assets simplifies tracking and inventory management. Asset Essentials is most suited for small to medium-sized businesses that require a comprehensive and cost-effective asset management solution. Its user-friendly interface, customizable features, and mobile app make it an ideal choice for organizations looking to streamline their asset tracking and reporting processes.
Want to know if WebCheckout is worth checking out? Users rave about WebCheckout's user-friendliness, robust functionality, and responsive customer support. One user, for example, highlighted how WebCheckout streamlined their EAM tasks, reducing hours of work to mere minutes. Another user declared WebCheckout the best EAM software they've encountered. Users appreciate the platform's intuitive design and powerful features, finding it superior to other options in the market. While specific comparisons to competitors like Asset Panda or EZOfficeInventory are limited in the provided reviews, the overwhelmingly positive sentiment suggests that users find WebCheckout a cut above the rest. WebCheckout seems ideally suited for businesses of all sizes looking to optimize their EAM processes. Its ease of use makes it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise, while its comprehensive functionality caters to a wide range of EAM needs. Whether you're a small business seeking to streamline inventory management or a large enterprise aiming to enhance operational efficiency, WebCheckout appears to offer a compelling solution. However, remember that software needs can vary greatly, so conducting thorough research and comparing options based on your specific requirements is always recommended.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...