Looking for alternatives to Jonas Construction Software? Many users crave user-friendly and feature-rich solutions for tasks like Dashboard and Reporting, Mobile Capabilities, and Bonus Management. Leveraging crowdsourced data from over 1,000 real Construction Management Software selection projects based on 400+ capabilities, we present a comparison of Jonas Construction Software to leading industry alternatives like Corecon, PlanGrid, iSqFt, and Bluebeam.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Construction Management Software
Jonas Construction Software has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 79% when considering 151 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.
Corecon has a 'good' User Satisfaction Rating of 78% when considering 77 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
PlanGrid has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 90% when considering 860 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
iSqFt has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 84% when considering 141 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
Bluebeam has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 93% when considering 2083 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
Jonas Construction is user-friendly and intuitive. Its features like payroll, scheduling, accounting and more are helpful and easy to use for most users. Users like its payroll management feature. It is easy to export databases in Excel. Users like its permission management feature. Once some time is put into learning how to use the program, it is fairly easy to use. However, commas don’t show up on invoices when million dollar bills are generated. It does not have dashboards. Some users think that they had to buy modules they didn’t need to upgrade the program.
Corecon is easy to use and has a powerful set of features to handle construction management projects. Exporting and importing data from other tools like Sage/Timberline is easy. Users are pleased with its reporting feature as they allow them to edit reports. It gives users access to databases to create reports. QuickBooks integration isn’t seamless for some users and may get buggy. Users say that it may be fit for a small number of large projects. All the information about client billing and subcontractor work is available in one place. The support team is reasonably helpful.
Is PlanGrid the grid you need to keep your construction projects on track? User reviews from the past year paint a mixed picture of the software's effectiveness. While many users praise PlanGrid's intuitive interface and robust features, others find it lacking in certain areas, particularly when compared to competitors like Procore and Bluebeam Revu. PlanGrid's strengths lie in its ease of use and comprehensive feature set. Users consistently highlight its ability to streamline communication and collaboration on construction projects. For example, one user praised PlanGrid's ability to "easily share drawings and markups with the entire team," which significantly improved communication and reduced errors. Another user found PlanGrid's "robust reporting features" invaluable for tracking project progress and identifying potential issues. However, some users find PlanGrid's mobile app to be clunky and slow, which can be frustrating for field workers who rely on it for daily tasks. Additionally, some users have expressed concerns about PlanGrid's integration with other software platforms, finding it difficult to seamlessly connect with their existing workflows. PlanGrid's differentiating factor is its focus on providing a user-friendly experience for construction professionals. This is evident in its intuitive interface and comprehensive feature set, which are designed to simplify complex tasks. However, this focus on user-friendliness comes at a cost, as some users find PlanGrid's features to be less robust than those offered by competitors. For example, some users have found PlanGrid's project management capabilities to be limited compared to Procore, which offers a more comprehensive suite of tools for managing complex projects. Ultimately, PlanGrid is best suited for construction teams that prioritize ease of use and collaboration over advanced features. If your team is looking for a simple and intuitive platform to manage their projects, PlanGrid could be a good option. However, if you require a more robust and feature-rich solution, you may want to consider other options.
iSqFt has garnered overwhelmingly positive feedback from users in the construction industry, who praise its comprehensive features and user-friendly interface. Reviewers frequently highlight the software's ability to streamline project management processes, saving both time and money. The platform's scheduling, budgeting, and communication tools have been particularly well-received, with many users noting improved team collaboration and project efficiency as a direct result of using iSqFt. Compared to competitors like Buildertrend and Procore, iSqFt is often lauded for its affordability and ease of use. While some users mention that iSqFt may lack certain advanced features found in higher-priced alternatives, the consensus is that it provides excellent value for its cost, especially for small to medium-sized construction businesses. The software's intuitive design and straightforward functionality make it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise, further contributing to its popularity. iSqFt appears to be an ideal solution for contractors seeking a reliable and efficient construction management software without the complexity and expense of some of the more robust platforms on the market. Its core features address the essential needs of construction professionals, making it a valuable tool for managing projects of all sizes.
Bluebeam's user reviews in the past year paint a picture of a powerful and versatile construction software with some room for improvement. Users praise its intuitive interface, extensive PDF editing and markup features, and seamless integration with popular project management platforms. These strengths are particularly valuable for streamlining communication and collaboration across disciplines, as exemplified by a reviewer who noted how Bluebeam "eliminated the need for paper markups and endless email chains" on their project. However, some users find Bluebeam's takeoff functionalities less robust compared to dedicated takeoff software like OnCenter or PlanSwift. While Bluebeam offers basic auto-scaling and dimensioning tools, complex projects often require manual verification and lack features like real-time material cost integration. This can be a dealbreaker for users who prioritize advanced takeoff capabilities. Another point of contention is the subscription pricing model, which some users find expensive compared to perpetual licenses offered by competitors. However, others appreciate the continuous updates and access to cloud-based features that come with the subscription. Ultimately, the cost-effectiveness depends on individual needs and project scale. In conclusion, Bluebeam excels in collaboration, communication, and general PDF management for construction projects. It's a strong choice for teams seeking a user-friendly platform to streamline workflows and centralize information. However, users requiring advanced takeoff functionalities or those on a tight budget might find other options more suitable.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...