HeavyJob vs Assemble

Is HeavyJob a heavy lift, or does it make light work of construction management? While users appreciate HeavyJob's robust functionality for managing employee time, budgets, job costs, and resources, they also point out its steep learning curve and outdated user interface as significant drawbacks. For instance, one user mentioned, "The software has a steep learning curve as there are so many features and functions," highlighting the initial hurdle of mastering the software. This duality makes HeavyJob a powerful tool that requires dedication to unlock its full potential. A standout feature is its seamless integration with payroll systems, simplifying a typically cumbersome process. One user praised this, stating, "The field easily enters their daily crew information which eventually is imported into our payroll system." However, the outdated interface and occasional lack of intuitive design can lead to frustration, with some users finding it difficult to navigate the multitude of features. HeavyJob is best suited for larger construction companies with dedicated staff who can invest time in training and fully utilize its extensive capabilities. Smaller firms may find the learning curve and cost prohibitive, especially if they don't require all the advanced features.

Assemble Insight offers tools to assess a model’s finish and accelerates its takeoff. It helps compare models with drawings and offers the ability to leverage quantities by group, code and quantity. It generates various metrics to track work progress, swiftly extracts relevant information and offers collaborative model visualizations with team members. However, the system doesn’t calculate variations in models accurately, is slow to handle large projects, has a cluttered homepage and cannot be used as a standalone estimation solution.