Our analysts compared Bluebeam vs VPO based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Construction Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
VPO provides a single platform to manage a construction project’s complete life cycle — from inception to completion. It is designed for architects, engineers, suppliers, vendors, owners, contractors and construction management firms. It is an easy-to-use, secure and cloud-based workspace used by project stakeholders to view, publish and measure progress.
It leverages Microsoft’s cloud-based modules and combines them with project management, providing a scalable workspace that works for small and large scale operations.
among all Construction Management Software
Bluebeam has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 93% when considering 2083 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
VPO has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 84% when considering 102 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
Bluebeam stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
Bluebeam's user reviews in the past year paint a picture of a powerful and versatile construction software with some room for improvement. Users praise its intuitive interface, extensive PDF editing and markup features, and seamless integration with popular project management platforms. These strengths are particularly valuable for streamlining communication and collaboration across disciplines, as exemplified by a reviewer who noted how Bluebeam "eliminated the need for paper markups and endless email chains" on their project. However, some users find Bluebeam's takeoff functionalities less robust compared to dedicated takeoff software like OnCenter or PlanSwift. While Bluebeam offers basic auto-scaling and dimensioning tools, complex projects often require manual verification and lack features like real-time material cost integration. This can be a dealbreaker for users who prioritize advanced takeoff capabilities. Another point of contention is the subscription pricing model, which some users find expensive compared to perpetual licenses offered by competitors. However, others appreciate the continuous updates and access to cloud-based features that come with the subscription. Ultimately, the cost-effectiveness depends on individual needs and project scale. In conclusion, Bluebeam excels in collaboration, communication, and general PDF management for construction projects. It's a strong choice for teams seeking a user-friendly platform to streamline workflows and centralize information. However, users requiring advanced takeoff functionalities or those on a tight budget might find other options more suitable.
VPO is a user-friendly and intuitive software solution. Existing users really like VPO’s workflow for RFIs and submittals. It lets users access reports and documents in a centralized location. It has also helped them streamline their workflows. It can be customized according to the needs of the users, though not everything can be customized. Also, users should note that it does not provide expanded or updated features post purchase. User permissions about who can view submittals may not be seamless when someone outside the team needs access.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...