Bluebeam vs Vista by Viewpoint

Bluebeam's user reviews in the past year paint a picture of a powerful and versatile construction software with some room for improvement. Users praise its intuitive interface, extensive PDF editing and markup features, and seamless integration with popular project management platforms. These strengths are particularly valuable for streamlining communication and collaboration across disciplines, as exemplified by a reviewer who noted how Bluebeam "eliminated the need for paper markups and endless email chains" on their project. However, some users find Bluebeam's takeoff functionalities less robust compared to dedicated takeoff software like OnCenter or PlanSwift. While Bluebeam offers basic auto-scaling and dimensioning tools, complex projects often require manual verification and lack features like real-time material cost integration. This can be a dealbreaker for users who prioritize advanced takeoff capabilities. Another point of contention is the subscription pricing model, which some users find expensive compared to perpetual licenses offered by competitors. However, others appreciate the continuous updates and access to cloud-based features that come with the subscription. Ultimately, the cost-effectiveness depends on individual needs and project scale. In conclusion, Bluebeam excels in collaboration, communication, and general PDF management for construction projects. It's a strong choice for teams seeking a user-friendly platform to streamline workflows and centralize information. However, users requiring advanced takeoff functionalities or those on a tight budget might find other options more suitable.

Vista By Viewpoint is a robust software solution that provides comprehensive tools that can do anything from finance to project management to HR. Users can track and automate almost any detail of construction costs and reporting. It offers integration with various modules such as Viewpoint One, HR Management Tools, Jobpac and more for efficient workflows. It has almost infinite possibilities for customization so that it can be tailored to the needs of the company. Reviewers said that due to the robust features available, it can take time to master the program. New releases seem to be rushed at times and may be buggy, creating problems with fields that have been customized. Some users said that when switching to the cloud, response times appear to be somewhat delayed, and the system can freeze when clicking on applications. Customer support is slow to respond, and users wished complex issues could be resolved more quickly.