Our analysts compared BIM 360 vs Aconex based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Construction Management Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Construction Management Software
BIM 360 has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 81% when considering 1893 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
Aconex has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 87% when considering 437 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
User reviews from the past year indicate that BIM 360 is a robust construction management software that streamlines collaboration and improves project efficiency. Its strengths lie in its comprehensive features, including design collaboration, document management, and project scheduling. Users appreciate its ability to connect teams in real-time, reducing communication barriers and fostering a collaborative environment. Additionally, its integration with other Autodesk products and its mobile accessibility are highly valued. Compared to similar products, BIM 360 stands out due to its user-friendly interface, customizable workflows, and extensive support documentation. Users note that its intuitive design makes it easy to navigate, even for those new to construction management software. The ability to tailor the platform to specific project needs is also a key differentiator, allowing teams to optimize their processes. Moreover, the comprehensive support materials and responsive customer service ensure that users can quickly resolve any issues or questions that arise. BIM 360 is particularly suited for large-scale construction projects that involve multiple stakeholders and complex workflows. Its robust collaboration features and ability to manage extensive project data make it an ideal solution for teams seeking to improve communication, streamline processes, and enhance overall project outcomes.
Oracle Aconex is suitable for large engineering and construction projects, though not so much for smaller operations. Its document management feature impressed most of its users, though many think that its interface isn’t easy to navigate. It does not support cut and paste from external documents to a message. Since it is a web-based module, the efficiency of this application depends on internet connectivity. Users liked that documents could be exported to Excel sheets. Some users complained that it wasn’t very reliable as a system and that they had to continuously refresh the page to make it work.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...