Aconex vs InEight

Oracle Aconex is suitable for large engineering and construction projects, though not so much for smaller operations. Its document management feature impressed most of its users, though many think that its interface isn’t easy to navigate. It does not support cut and paste from external documents to a message. Since it is a web-based module, the efficiency of this application depends on internet connectivity. Users liked that documents could be exported to Excel sheets. Some users complained that it wasn’t very reliable as a system and that they had to continuously refresh the page to make it work.

Is InEight truly great, or does it just think it is? User reviews from the past year paint a somewhat complicated picture of this construction management software. While many users praise InEight for its extensive project management capabilities, including robust reporting tools and integration with other software, a recurring theme emerges: its complexity. One user lauded InEight's ability to export data to scheduling and accounting software, significantly reducing manual effort. Another effused about its comprehensive nature, likening it to "having a project manager who never eats, sleeps, or takes a break." However, this power comes at a price, as some users found the software's learning curve steep, requiring substantial training to master. One reviewer candidly shared that their company hesitated to continue using InEight due to its complexity. Another user, while praising the software's bid wizard for streamlining job setup, acknowledged that integrating InEight with other programs posed a challenge. This dichotomy suggests that InEight might be best suited for larger construction firms or those with dedicated IT resources who can invest in training and customization. Smaller companies or those seeking a more intuitive, out-of-the-box solution might find InEight overwhelming. It's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole – possible, but not without some effort.