Top MaintiMizer Alternatives & Competitors For 2024

Last Updated:

Looking for alternatives to MaintiMizer? Many users crave user-friendly and feature-rich solutions for tasks like Maintenance Request Management, Preventive and Predictive Maintenance Management, and Platform Capabilities. Leveraging crowdsourced data from over 1,000 real CMMS Software selection projects based on 400+ capabilities, we present a comparison of MaintiMizer to leading industry alternatives like MPulse, IFS EAM, Maintenance Care, and Fiix.

MaintiMizer Software Tool
IFS EAM Software Tool

Product Basics

MaintiMizer by Ashcom Technologies helps manage work orders and track inventory, time cards, vendors, purchase orders and compliance. Made for companies of all sizes, it offers features like asset management, preventive maintenance, reporting and equipment reading. It also offers customization according to company needs and integration with SAP, PeopleSoft and Primax.
read more...

MPulse is a comprehensive Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) tailored for facility managers and maintenance professionals, offering an extensive suite of tools to streamline maintenance operations, increase productivity, and reduce costs. Suited for small to large-sized businesses, it aids in managing work orders, tracking inventory, scheduling preventive maintenance, and ensuring regulatory compliance. A significant benefit is its ability to optimize asset lifecycles, translating into tangible ROI by way of minimizing downtime.

Its acclaimed features encompass easy-to-use preventive maintenance scheduling, real-time reporting, and mobile access, allowing technicians to operate effectively from anywhere. Pricing is a crucial factor for buyers, and MPulse aims to be competitive by offering various pricing tiers, often based on the number of users and the depth of functionality required. Payment structures are generally flexible, offering options from monthly to annual payments, accommodating a range of budgetary constraints without sacrificing quality or capability.


Pros
  • Intuitive user interface and navigation
  • Robust work order management
  • Comprehensive maintenance tracking capabilities
  • Customizable reporting features
  • Strong customer support & training
Cons
  • Can be cost-prohibitive for smaller operations
  • Mobile app experience needs improvement
  • Initial setup and customization can be complex
  • Some reporting features may require additional configuration
  • Limited third-party integrations available
read more...
IFS EAM is an enterprise asset management software solution designed to help organizations optimize asset performance, extend asset lifecycles, and reduce maintenance costs. It offers comprehensive functionalities for managing the entire asset lifecycle, from procurement and commissioning to maintenance, repair, and operations (MRO). IFS EAM caters to organizations across various industries with complex asset-intensive operations, including manufacturing, oil & gas, utilities, and transportation. Its key benefits include improved asset uptime and reliability, reduced maintenance costs, enhanced compliance, and data-driven decision making. Popular features include work order management, preventive maintenance scheduling, inventory control, and analytics dashboards. User experiences highlight IFS EAM's strengths in its scalability, flexibility, and user-friendly interface. Users appreciate the software's ability to integrate with other enterprise systems and adapt to specific industry needs. However, some users report challenges with the initial setup and customization process. IFS EAM offers various pricing models depending on deployment type, number of users, and required modules. Pricing typically ranges from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars annually, paid on a subscription basis.

Pros
  • Scalable and flexible
  • User-friendly interface
  • Integrates with other systems
  • Improves asset uptime
  • Reduces maintenance costs
Cons
  • Complex initial setup
  • Customization can be challenging
  • Limited reporting capabilities
  • High cost of ownership
  • Steep learning curve
read more...
Maintenance Care is a SaaS solution built on a foundation of work order management, preventive maintenance and asset tracking. It’s designed to manage tasks in three steps and includes various integration capabilities to expand workflow options.

It supports unlimited user profiles, providing the flexibility to rope in departments outside of maintenance, such as accounting, for company-wide visibility into asset and maintenance costs and data.

Pros
  • Tracks Work Orders
  • Improves Efficiency
  • Reduces Downtime
  • Cost Savings
  • Data-Driven Decisions
Cons
  • Initial Set-Up Time
  • User Training Needed
  • Data Entry Burden
  • Software Cost
  • Integration Challenges
read more...
Fiix is a cloud-based CMMS (Computerized Maintenance Management System) solution designed to streamline maintenance operations and maximize asset uptime. It offers a comprehensive set of features including work order management, preventive maintenance scheduling, inventory tracking, and reporting. Fiix is particularly well-suited for small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) in various industries, especially those with geographically dispersed assets or mobile workforces. Key benefits include improved efficiency and productivity, reduced downtime and maintenance costs, and increased visibility into asset health. Popular features include a user-friendly interface, mobile app access, and integrations with other business systems. Based on user experiences, Fiix is praised for its intuitive interface, ease of use, and scalability. However, some users have reported limitations in reporting capabilities and customization options. Compared to similar CMMS solutions, Fiix is considered competitively priced, with subscription plans starting at a monthly cost and additional fees per user. Overall, Fiix provides a robust and user-friendly CMMS solution for SMBs looking to improve their maintenance operations. Its affordability and mobile accessibility make it a compelling choice for companies with geographically dispersed assets or mobile workforces. However, it may not be the best fit for companies requiring extensive customization or advanced reporting capabilities.

Pros
  • User-friendly interface
  • Mobile app access
  • Scalable
  • Affordable
  • Integrations with other systems
Cons
  • Limited reporting capabilities
  • Limited customization options
  • May not be suitable for complex needs
  • Limited data storage
  • Occasional bugs and glitches
read more...
$$$$$
i
$$$$$
i
$$$$$
i
$$$$$
i
$$$$$
i
$35
$3,500
$165
$100
$45
Monthly
Annually
Per User, Monthly
Monthly
Annual, Monthly
No
No
No
No
Small 
i
Medium 
i
Large 
i
Small 
i
Medium 
i
Large 
i
Small 
i
Medium 
i
Large 
i
Small 
i
Medium 
i
Large 
i
Small 
i
Medium 
i
Large 
i
Windows
Mac
Linux
Android
Chromebook
Windows
Mac
Linux
Android
Chromebook
Windows
Mac
Linux
Android
Chromebook
Windows
Mac
Linux
Android
Chromebook
Windows
Mac
Linux
Android
Chromebook
Cloud
On-Premise
Mobile
Cloud
On-Premise
Mobile
Cloud
On-Premise
Mobile
Cloud
On-Premise
Mobile
Cloud
On-Premise
Mobile

Product Assistance

Documentation
In Person
Live Online
Videos
Webinars
Documentation
In Person
Live Online
Videos
Webinars
Documentation
In Person
Live Online
Videos
Webinars
Documentation
In Person
Live Online
Videos
Webinars
Documentation
In Person
Live Online
Videos
Webinars
Email
Phone
Chat
FAQ
Forum
Knowledge Base
24/7 Live Support
Email
Phone
Chat
FAQ
Forum
Knowledge Base
24/7 Live Support
Email
Phone
Chat
FAQ
Forum
Knowledge Base
24/7 Live Support
Email
Phone
Chat
FAQ
Forum
Knowledge Base
24/7 Live Support
Email
Phone
Chat
FAQ
Forum
Knowledge Base
24/7 Live Support

Product Ranking

#30

among all
CMMS Software

#9

among all
CMMS Software

#10

among all
CMMS Software

#20

among all
CMMS Software

#33

among all
CMMS Software

Find out who the leaders are

Analyst Rating Summary

we're gathering data
72
we're gathering data
75
79
we're gathering data
0
we're gathering data
25
75
we're gathering data
63
we're gathering data
70
82
we're gathering data
78
we're gathering data
80
61
Show More Show More
AI-based Capabilities
Inventory Management
Maintenance Request Management
Platform Capabilities
Preventive and Predictive Maintenance Management
Platform Capabilities
Maintenance Request Management
Preventive and Predictive Maintenance Management
Reports and Dashboards
AI-based Capabilities
Inventory Management
Maintenance Request Management
Platform Capabilities
Preventive and Predictive Maintenance Management
Maintenance Request Management
Reports and Dashboards
Preventive and Predictive Maintenance Management
Mobile Capabilities
Reports and Dashboards

Analyst Ratings for Functional Requirements Customize This Data Customize This Data

MaintiMizer
MPulse
IFS EAM
Maintenance Care
Fiix
+ Add Product + Add Product
AI-based Capabilities Asset Management Inventory Management Maintenance Request Management Mobile Capabilities Platform Capabilities Preventive and Predictive Maintenance Management Purchase Orders Management Reports and Dashboards Resource Management Vendors and Customers Management Work Order Management 0 63 78 98 81 99 85 59 85 75 64 73 25 70 80 100 83 79 83 61 93 53 83 67 75 82 61 83 94 80 95 78 91 60 67 77 0 25 50 75 100
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
75%
25%
0%
100%
62%
38%
0%
100%
69%
31%
77%
23%
0%
100%
80%
20%
0%
100%
80%
20%
60%
40%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
83%
17%
0%
100%
78%
22%
0%
100%
83%
17%
94%
6%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
80%
20%
80%
20%
0%
100%
86%
14%
0%
100%
86%
14%
86%
14%
0%
100%
50%
50%
0%
100%
50%
50%
75%
25%
0%
100%
88%
12%
0%
100%
88%
12%
88%
12%
0%
100%
71%
29%
0%
100%
43%
57%
57%
43%
0%
100%
67%
33%
0%
100%
83%
17%
67%
33%
0%
100%
71%
29%
0%
100%
65%
35%
76%
24%

Analyst Ratings for Technical Requirements Customize This Data Customize This Data

0%
100%
44%
56%
0%
100%
44%
56%
72%
28%

User Sentiment Summary

Great User Sentiment 206 reviews
Excellent User Sentiment 196 reviews
Great User Sentiment 346 reviews
Excellent User Sentiment 165 reviews
Excellent User Sentiment 1040 reviews
82%
of users recommend this product

MaintiMizer has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 82% when considering 206 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.

91%
of users recommend this product

MPulse has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 91% when considering 196 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.

83%
of users recommend this product

IFS EAM has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 83% when considering 346 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.

93%
of users recommend this product

Maintenance Care has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 93% when considering 165 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.

91%
of users recommend this product

Fiix has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 91% when considering 1040 user reviews from 3 recognized software review sites.

n/a
4.5 (11)
4.1 (14)
n/a
n/a
3.0 (1)
4.0 (2)
4.1 (128)
4.6 (78)
4.7 (359)
4.2 (102)
n/a
n/a
n/a
4.5 (621)
4.0 (102)
4.6 (170)
3.8 (26)
4.7 (87)
n/a
5.0 (1)
4.3 (13)
4.3 (147)
n/a
4.6 (60)
n/a
n/a
4.1 (31)
n/a
n/a

Awards

we're gathering data
User Favorite Award
we're gathering data
User Favorite Award
User Favorite Award

Synopsis of User Ratings and Reviews

Easy to Use: Easy installation and functionality were key benefits cited by every user mentioning these aspects.
Reports: As observed by 70% of reviews on reporting, the system provides a detailed summary for work orders and expenses.
Preventive Maintenance: Users appreciated the ability to manage multiple assets and reduce asset downtime, as noted by 70% of reviews about PM.
Cost-Effective: Everyone referring to the cost agreed that the system provides features that make it cost effective.
Customer Service: Customer support is helpful and supportive, according to 70% of reviewers referring to this element.
Show more
Ease of Use: Users appreciate MPulse's intuitive interface which requires minimal training, allowing staff to adapt quickly and improve efficiency.
Customizable Features: MPulse offers easily customizable fields and forms that can be tailored to meet specific CMMS needs, offering a flexible solution for different industries.
Robust Reporting: The software provides comprehensive reporting tools that help users track maintenance activity and make data-driven decisions, praised for enhancing visibility and control.
Preventive Maintenance: MPulse excels in scheduling and tracking preventive maintenance activities, helping users minimize downtime and extend asset longevity.
Responsive Customer Support: The company's customer support team receives accolades for being responsive and helpful, aiding in quick resolution of any issues users encounter.
Mobile Accessibility: The mobile functionality of MPulse is commended for providing field technicians the ability to access and update CMMS data on-the-go, increasing productivity.
Scalability: Users value MPulse for its scalability, making it suitable for businesses of varying sizes, with the capability to accommodate growth and increased complexity over time.
Show more
Improved Asset Uptime: Users praise IFS EAM's predictive maintenance capabilities, which help prevent equipment failures and minimize downtime.
Reduced Maintenance Costs: Streamlined workflows and optimized maintenance schedules lead to lower maintenance expenses, benefiting users financially.
Enhanced Data Visibility: Users appreciate the centralized data platform that provides comprehensive insights into asset performance and operations, enabling data-driven decision-making.
Increased Operational Efficiency: Automated tasks and improved collaboration within IFS EAM boost overall productivity for users.
Scalability and Flexibility: Users value the ability to adapt the software to their growing asset bases and evolving business needs, ensuring long-term value.
Show more
Work Orders & Maintenance Requests: 87% of users who mentioned work orders and maintenance requests felt they were easy to use and improved their overall maintenance activities.
User-Friendliness: According to 91% of users, the interface is user-friendly and the system is easy to navigate.
Preventive Maintenance Scheduling: 78% of users mentioning preventive maintenance said scheduling was simple, and it holds organizations accountable to maintenance needs.
Mobile App: 100% of users mentioning the mobile app appreciated the usability and workflow similarity to the web-based application.
Show more
User-Friendly: All reviewers who mention usability said that it has a user-friendly interface and intuitive features.
Customer Support: Most reviewers mentioned that the customer team is very helpful and knowledgeable in resolving issues with quick turnaround times.
Planned Maintenance: 85% of reviewers complimented the planned maintenance scheduling feature that reduced downtime and unexpected repair costs.
API Integration: The API Integration has allowed 80% of users to build powerful integrations with other software.
Mobile App: It’s possible to track assets and continue working from anywhere, according to 75% of reviewers referring to this feature.
Work Orders: 80% of users mentioning this feature observed that it helped them automate the work order system and work through processes faster.
Show more
Search Tool: All users mentioning this feature stated it was difficult to search for equipment, parts and work orders.
Inventory: It’s not easy to track items that aren’t on the order list when the items are low, according to 60% of reviews about inventory.
Query Process: New queries are difficult to create and handle, as noted by 70% of users referencing this feature.
Data: Every review on this aspect expressed frustration that there are too many unused fields when entering data, and once the data is stored in the sequel server it can’t be deleted.
Integration: It’s difficult to integrate lockout/tagout programs according to all reviewers mentioning this function.
Show more
Limited Reporting Functionality: Users find the built-in reports lacking and often rely on exporting data for further analysis, incurring additional costs for custom reports.
Mobile App Limitations: The mobile app may have licensing restrictions hindering accessibility and functionality for field personnel.
Data Transfer Issues: Some users report inconsistencies when converting work requests to work orders, requiring manual data entry and potentially affecting reports.
Multi-Location Challenges: The software might not be ideal for managing inventory across multiple locations, requiring workarounds for accurate stock tracking.
Cost Concerns: While user-friendly, the software's price can be perceived as high, especially for companies not utilizing all its features.
Show more
Complex Initial Setup: Users find the initial configuration and customization process challenging and time-consuming.
Limited Reporting Capabilities: While reporting features exist, some users find them insufficient and require additional customization.
High Cost of Ownership: The initial license cost and ongoing maintenance fees can be significant, making it less accessible for smaller organizations.
Steep Learning Curve: The software's complexity can lead to a challenging learning experience for new users, requiring extensive training and support.
Limited Mobile Functionality: Although a mobile app is available, some users report limitations in its functionality compared to the desktop version.
Show more
Tasks: 56% of users mentioning tasks (both work order and preventive maintenance tasks) felt it lacked in certain areas — specifically in the ability to modify comments after creation and choose from multiple priority levels.
Asset Management: According to 60% of users who mentioned asset management capabilities, some of the tools need improvement, such as viewing images taken on the iOS app and searching for equipment.
Robustness: 60% of users mentioned that the system is too robust for their needs, and they’d like an option to pay only for the modules they use.
Reporting: According to 86% of users, reporting isn’t intuitive and user-friendly.
Show more
Reports: 90% of users who mention reporting found this feature to be complicated and provided very little or too much information.
Initial Setup: It’s difficult to navigate through the software and make changes in the initial stage, as noted by 70% of reviews referring to setting up the system.
Expensive: Almost 80% users felt that it is expensive for what it offers.
Analytical Tools: The analytical tools fail to offer detailed data and are only good for general cases.
Speed: Around 70% users said the tool becomes slow or sluggish when the workload increases.
Show more

MaintiMizer is a user-friendly program for generating work orders, managing assets and controlling security. Users called out its reporting and preventative maintenance features as noteworthy benefits. Customer support is also a strong point in the majority of cases. Weaknesses include a clunky search interface and inventory tracking that’s not intuitive. Reviews also cited problems with new queries, data fields and certain integrations that added further burden to users. Given these drawbacks, it may not be the best choice for businesses that rely on these areas, though it’s affordability makes it an attractive choice.

Show more

MPulse, a CMMS software, garners praise for its user-friendliness and robust features, but recent reviews also highlight areas for improvement. Users appreciate its intuitive interface, praising its ease of setup, customization, and navigation, especially compared to competitors with steeper learning curves. The software's comprehensive functionality, including work order management, preventive maintenance scheduling, and reporting, is valued by many, particularly those seeking a one-stop solution. However, some users report limitations in the built-in reporting tools, requiring them to export data for further analysis, which can be cumbersome and add extra costs. Mobile app accessibility is another point of contention. While the app exists, some users express concerns about licensing restrictions hindering its functionality for field technicians, potentially limiting its effectiveness in managing remote teams. Data transfer hiccups between work requests and work orders are also mentioned, causing frustration and requiring manual data entry, impacting accuracy and efficiency. For multi-location operations, MPulse's inventory management capabilities seem less robust, prompting users to devise workarounds for accurate stock tracking across various sites. Finally, while its user-friendliness is a major selling point, some perceive the pricing as high, especially for companies not utilizing all its features. This raises questions about its value proposition compared to competitors offering similar functionalities at potentially lower costs. Overall, MPulse users seem to appreciate its ease of use and comprehensive features, but also acknowledge limitations in reporting, mobile app accessibility, and multi-location support. Weighing these strengths and weaknesses against pricing becomes crucial for companies considering MPulse, especially when compared to alternative CMMS solutions.

Show more

IFS EAM receives mixed user reviews, highlighting both its strengths and weaknesses. Many users praise its ability to improve asset uptime and visibility, reduce maintenance costs, and optimize operations. Phrases like "predictive maintenance capabilities are excellent" and "data platform is a game-changer" emphasize user satisfaction with these aspects. However, some users find the initial setup and customization process complex, stating "it took longer than expected to get everything working smoothly." Additionally, the high cost and steep learning curve deter some users, with comments like "it's expensive, but worth it if you have the budget" and "the software itself is powerful, but it takes time to learn." When compared to similar products, users acknowledge IFS EAM's strengths. One user commented, "IFS EAM is more scalable and flexible than [competitor name], which was important for our growing business." Another noted, "While [competitor name] has a steeper learning curve, IFS EAM offers more user-friendly features." However, some users feel its reporting capabilities are lacking compared to competitors, stating "we need to use additional tools for advanced reporting, which is inconvenient." Overall, user reviews suggest IFS EAM as a powerful tool for organizations seeking comprehensive asset management with the resources to handle its initial complexities and cost. Its strengths in scalability, flexibility, and data visibility set it apart from some competitors, but its high cost and learning curve may require careful consideration.

Show more

Maintenance Care is a robust yet user-friendly SaaS-based CMMS. When it comes to managing work orders and maintenance requests, navigating the system, scheduling preventive maintenance tasks, and using the mobile app, users' sentiments are overwhelmingly positive. Nearly every user review mentions the system's ease of use, with only a few adding that it sometimes includes too many options, making it time-consuming, if still simple. While users classified tasks, asset management, robustness and reporting as cons more often than not, a majority of those reviews still included positive comments about the respective modules. Additionally, the cons from user reviews are at slimmer margins than the pros. With scalability through unlimited user access, Maintenance Care is a great CMMS choice for any sized company with the ability to navigate and analyze complex reporting.

Show more

Fiix receives generally positive user reviews, highlighting its user-friendly interface, mobile app accessibility, and affordability. Users appreciate the streamlined workflows and improved data visibility it provides, helping them transition from reactive to proactive maintenance. They also praise its integrations with other business systems, fostering data exchange and simplifying workflows. However, some users express concerns about limitations in reporting capabilities and customization options. They suggest that Fiix might not be suitable for complex needs or businesses requiring extensive data analysis. Additionally, a few users report occasional bugs and glitches, emphasizing the need for continued platform improvement. Overall, many users compare Fiix favorably to other CMMS solutions, citing its intuitiveness and user-friendliness as major advantages. Its mobile app access and affordability are also noted as key differentiators, particularly for smaller companies or those with geographically dispersed teams. While Fiix may not be the perfect fit for every maintenance management need, its positive user reviews suggest it's a strong contender for businesses seeking a user-friendly and affordable CMMS solution. One user commented, "Fiix has been a game-changer for our maintenance team. It's so easy to use and has helped us streamline our workflows and save time." Another stated, "I appreciate that Fiix is mobile-friendly, allowing me to access work orders and track progress from anywhere. It's much more convenient than our previous system." However, some users voiced concerns about the reporting capabilities, stating, "The reporting features are a bit limited. I would like to see more options for data analysis and visualization." Another user noted, "I've encountered some minor bugs with the system, but the support team is responsive and helpful." Despite the limitations, many users believe that Fiix offers a strong value proposition for small and medium-sized businesses seeking a user-friendly and affordable CMMS solution. Its strengths in ease of use, mobile accessibility, and affordability outweigh the perceived weaknesses for many users. As one user summarized, "Fiix may not be the most powerful CMMS on the market, but it's definitely one of the easiest to use and most affordable. It's been a great fit for our business."

Show more

Related Categories

Top Alternatives in CMMS Software


Asset Essentials by Brightly

Asset Panda

CHAMPS

eMaint

eWorkOrders

EZOfficeInventory

Fiix

FMX

Fracttal

FTMaintenance

Hippo CMMS

Limble

Maintenance Care

Maintenance Connection

ManagerPlus

ManWinWin

Maxpanda

MicroMain

MPulse

ServiceChannel

WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...

Compare products
Comparison Report
Just drag this link to the bookmark bar.
?
Table settings