Our analysts compared iMaint vs eWorkOrders based on data from our 400+ point analysis of CMMS Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
eWorkOrders is a cloud-based CMMS (Computerized Maintenance Management System) designed to help organizations manage and optimize their assets, maintenance tasks, and inventory. It's particularly suited for small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) across various industries like manufacturing, healthcare, property management, and education.
Key benefits include streamlining work order creation and tracking, automating preventive maintenance schedules, improving asset visibility and utilization, and generating reports for data-driven decision making. Popular features encompass mobile app accessibility, customizable dashboards, inventory management tools, and compliance tracking capabilities.
User reviews highlight its ease of use, intuitive interface, and affordability compared to enterprise-grade CMMS solutions. However, some users mention limitations in complex reporting functionalities and integrations with external systems. Pricing typically falls within the $35-$80 per user per month range, with flexible subscription options based on user count and desired features.
among all CMMS Software
iMaint has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 88% when considering 20 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
eWorkOrders has a 'excellent' User Satisfaction Rating of 98% when considering 107 user reviews from 2 recognized software review sites.
eWorkOrders stands above the rest by achieving an ‘Excellent’ rating as a User Favorite.
Is iMaint truly a cut above when it comes to maintenance management software? User reviews from the past year suggest that iMaint is a robust and user-friendly CMMS solution that excels in several key areas. Users consistently highlight its customizability, allowing them to tailor the software to their specific needs, much like adjusting a wrench for different bolt sizes. The comprehensive reporting tools provide valuable insights into maintenance operations, enabling data-driven decision-making. Moreover, iMaint's intuitive design simplifies user training and implementation across multiple locations, ensuring a smooth transition for organizations. However, no software is without its drawbacks. Some users have expressed that the mobile app could benefit from enhanced functionality to minimize reliance on paper-based processes, which can be cumbersome in today's digital age. Additionally, while iMaint offers a wide array of features, a few users found the initial setup process for certain tasks, such as recurring preventative maintenance, to be somewhat complex. Despite these minor shortcomings, iMaint remains a powerful tool for organizations seeking to optimize their maintenance management processes. Its strengths in customizability, reporting, and user-friendliness, coupled with its highly-regarded customer support, make it a compelling choice for businesses of all sizes looking to streamline their maintenance operations and maximize efficiency.
EWorkOrders, a cloud-based CMMS, resonates with users for its user-friendly interface, affordability, and focus on core maintenance needs. Compared to competitors, users praise its intuitive mobile app empowering technicians, automated scheduling for preventive maintenance, and decent inventory management tools. However, limited reporting capabilities and integrations raise concerns, especially for complex needs. Many users, particularly from small and medium businesses, highlight the ease of use and affordability compared to feature-rich enterprise CMMS. One user, transitioning from paper-based systems, appreciated the "intuitive interface and mobile app that streamlined workflows and boosted communication." Another user, running a manufacturing facility, valued the "affordable subscription plan and decent inventory management, perfect for our basic maintenance needs." However, users with more complex requirements mention limitations. One user in a large healthcare facility noted, "the reporting features weren't as robust as I needed for in-depth analysis," while another user managing a diverse asset portfolio commented, "integrations with other software were limited, requiring workarounds or additional fees." These limitations can become dealbreakers for users seeking extensive data insights or intricate system connections. Ultimately, eWorkOrders shines for its user-friendliness, affordability, and focus on core CMMS functionalities. But users with advanced needs might require more elaborate reporting, integrations, and scalability offered by competitors. Understanding your specific maintenance requirements and comparing feature sets is crucial before choosing the right CMMS solution.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...