Toky vs Lingo Communications

User reviews from the past year suggest Toky is a bit of a mixed bag. While many appreciate its affordability and ease of use, particularly for small businesses dipping their toes into the world of VoIP, some have found its feature set a bit lacking compared to more established players like RingCentral or Dialpad. For example, users praise Toky's simple call forwarding and voicemail features, finding them intuitive and reliable. However, more advanced features like call analytics or CRM integrations seem to be where Toky falls short, leaving some users wanting more. Essentially, Toky seems best suited for small businesses or startups that prioritize simplicity and affordability over a vast array of features. If you're a larger company with complex communication needs, you might find yourself yearning for the robust functionality of Toky's more seasoned competitors.

Is Lingo Communications all it's cracked up to be, or will it leave you tongue-tied? User reviews from the past year paint a bleak picture of Lingo Communications, with a litany of recurring complaints. Customers frequently report abysmal customer service experiences, citing unresponsive support and a struggle to get issues resolved. Predatory billing practices are another common grievance, with users mentioning unexpected charges and arduous cancellation processes, often incurring hefty fees. Service reliability emerges as a major concern, with numerous reports of outages and technical issues, leaving some customers without service for extended periods. While Lingo Communications claims to offer a modern and efficient IP-based cloud voice and data service, the overwhelming negative feedback regarding customer service and billing practices overshadows any potential benefits. For instance, one user reported being billed for a service that was never hooked up, highlighting the company's questionable billing practices. Another user shared their experience of enduring dropped calls after an hour, a hidden policy that only came to light after repeated occurrences. These issues, coupled with the negative sentiment expressed across multiple platforms, suggest that Lingo Communications falls short compared to its competitors. In conclusion, Lingo Communications seems best suited for those who enjoy playing Russian roulette with their business communications. The overwhelming negative feedback, particularly concerning customer service, billing, and service reliability, makes it challenging to recommend Lingo Communications to any business seeking a reliable and trustworthy communications provider. Potential customers are advised to explore alternative options that prioritize customer satisfaction and transparent business practices.