GoToMeeting vs Lingo Communications

GoToMeeting is a chat and video conferencing tool with screen sharing, recording and collaboration options. About 78% of the users who review its features say it enables team collaboration via screen-sharing and chat options. Almost 76% of the users who review its user-friendliness say it’s intuitive and easy-to-use, though a few feel its interface is clunky and needs to be updated. On the flip side, around 79% of the users who mention pricing say the software’s subscription plans can be costly for smaller organizations. Quite a few users say a meeting limit of 3 users and 40 minutes provided with the basic version is too restrictive. Around 75% of the users who mention the software’s performance say it’s resource-intensive. To sum up, GoToMeeting enables enterprise teams to connect and work together virtually. But, its free version is pretty lightweight, and organizations should check out the subscription plans before deciding if it’s a good fit.

Is Lingo Communications all it's cracked up to be, or will it leave you tongue-tied? User reviews from the past year paint a bleak picture of Lingo Communications, with a litany of recurring complaints. Customers frequently report abysmal customer service experiences, citing unresponsive support and a struggle to get issues resolved. Predatory billing practices are another common grievance, with users mentioning unexpected charges and arduous cancellation processes, often incurring hefty fees. Service reliability emerges as a major concern, with numerous reports of outages and technical issues, leaving some customers without service for extended periods. While Lingo Communications claims to offer a modern and efficient IP-based cloud voice and data service, the overwhelming negative feedback regarding customer service and billing practices overshadows any potential benefits. For instance, one user reported being billed for a service that was never hooked up, highlighting the company's questionable billing practices. Another user shared their experience of enduring dropped calls after an hour, a hidden policy that only came to light after repeated occurrences. These issues, coupled with the negative sentiment expressed across multiple platforms, suggest that Lingo Communications falls short compared to its competitors. In conclusion, Lingo Communications seems best suited for those who enjoy playing Russian roulette with their business communications. The overwhelming negative feedback, particularly concerning customer service, billing, and service reliability, makes it challenging to recommend Lingo Communications to any business seeking a reliable and trustworthy communications provider. Potential customers are advised to explore alternative options that prioritize customer satisfaction and transparent business practices.