Broadvoice vs Lingo Communications

Let's amplify the voices of Broadvoice users and see what they have to say: Broadvoice generally receives positive feedback, with users highlighting its reliability, call quality, and comprehensive features as key strengths. The platform's stability ensures minimal downtime, allowing businesses to maintain consistent communication with clients. Users appreciate the clear voice quality, which enhances professionalism and customer satisfaction. Broadvoice's extensive feature set, including call recording, voicemail transcription, and virtual receptionist, empowers businesses to streamline communication processes and improve efficiency. Some users find the interface slightly complex initially, but training resources and customer support help overcome this challenge. Compared to competitors like RingCentral and Ooma, Broadvoice offers competitive pricing and a wider range of features, making it a compelling choice for businesses seeking a robust and cost-effective solution. However, some users note that Broadvoice's mobile app functionality could be improved. Overall, Broadvoice is well-suited for small to medium-sized businesses that prioritize reliability, call quality, and a comprehensive feature set to enhance their communication capabilities. Its scalability allows it to grow alongside businesses, making it a valuable long-term investment.

Is Lingo Communications all it's cracked up to be, or will it leave you tongue-tied? User reviews from the past year paint a bleak picture of Lingo Communications, with a litany of recurring complaints. Customers frequently report abysmal customer service experiences, citing unresponsive support and a struggle to get issues resolved. Predatory billing practices are another common grievance, with users mentioning unexpected charges and arduous cancellation processes, often incurring hefty fees. Service reliability emerges as a major concern, with numerous reports of outages and technical issues, leaving some customers without service for extended periods. While Lingo Communications claims to offer a modern and efficient IP-based cloud voice and data service, the overwhelming negative feedback regarding customer service and billing practices overshadows any potential benefits. For instance, one user reported being billed for a service that was never hooked up, highlighting the company's questionable billing practices. Another user shared their experience of enduring dropped calls after an hour, a hidden policy that only came to light after repeated occurrences. These issues, coupled with the negative sentiment expressed across multiple platforms, suggest that Lingo Communications falls short compared to its competitors. In conclusion, Lingo Communications seems best suited for those who enjoy playing Russian roulette with their business communications. The overwhelming negative feedback, particularly concerning customer service, billing, and service reliability, makes it challenging to recommend Lingo Communications to any business seeking a reliable and trustworthy communications provider. Potential customers are advised to explore alternative options that prioritize customer satisfaction and transparent business practices.