Our analysts compared SageMaker vs QlikView based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Big Data Analytics Tools, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Big Data Analytics Tools
QlikView has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 82% when considering 1859 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
User reviews of Amazon SageMaker reveal a platform appreciated for its robust feature set, scalability, and cost-efficiency. Many users find its comprehensive tools for data preprocessing, model training, deployment, and monitoring to be a significant strength. Scalability is another key advantage, with SageMaker accommodating both small-scale experiments and large-scale production workloads effectively. However, some users point out that SageMaker has a steep learning curve, particularly for beginners, and cost management can be challenging, especially during extensive model training. The platform's dependency on the broader AWS ecosystem can lead to vendor lock-in, which may not be ideal for organizations seeking flexibility. SageMaker's AutoML capabilities, such as Autopilot, are praised for automating complex tasks, but some advanced users note limitations in customization. Additionally, while designed for real-time inference, it may not be optimized for batch processing or offline use cases. In comparison to similar products, SageMaker stands out for its deep integration with AWS services, making it a preferred choice for those already within the AWS ecosystem. However, the learning curve and potential cost challenges are factors that users weigh against its benefits. The platform's active community support and extensive documentation receive positive mentions, contributing to a smoother user experience. Overall, Amazon SageMaker is a powerful tool for machine learning but requires careful consideration of its complexities and potential cost implications.
QlikView is one of the foremost BI solutions in the market today, mainly due to the power of its associative query engine to link data from multiple sources that drives its visually impressive dashboards. With its strong data visualization capabilities, users can perform search and filter through data on-the-fly and conduct deep-dives to glean insights that matter to them. With a fast setup, users can have their first data model up and running in very little time. The software resides in-memory and houses data in RAM for quicker retrieval. With multi-tier access permissions for in-organization users, it enables users to view executive summaries at a glance, while allowing them to drill-down into data to find out more. Sadly, Qlik is now scaling back on improvements and updates for QlikView and focusing on promoting QlikSense instead, a possible reason why its filter and search functions, ad-hoc reporting and graphics are lagging in terms of quality, as mentioned in many user reviews. Also, this platform can prove to be resource-heavy for databases housed on local machines, especially when performing batch update jobs. In addition to inflexible pricing plans and the cost of licensing, quite a few necessary add-ons are paid. In summary, QlikView is one of the leading in-memory BI tools available in the market today and rates excellently with users in terms of data aggregation and visualization capabilities; however, buyers should factor in its pricing plans and other limitations when searching for the perfect BI solution for their enterprise.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...