Our analysts compared QlikView vs IBM Watson Studio based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Big Data Analytics Tools, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Big Data Analytics Tools
QlikView has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 82% when considering 1859 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
QlikView is one of the foremost BI solutions in the market today, mainly due to the power of its associative query engine to link data from multiple sources that drives its visually impressive dashboards. With its strong data visualization capabilities, users can perform search and filter through data on-the-fly and conduct deep-dives to glean insights that matter to them. With a fast setup, users can have their first data model up and running in very little time. The software resides in-memory and houses data in RAM for quicker retrieval. With multi-tier access permissions for in-organization users, it enables users to view executive summaries at a glance, while allowing them to drill-down into data to find out more. Sadly, Qlik is now scaling back on improvements and updates for QlikView and focusing on promoting QlikSense instead, a possible reason why its filter and search functions, ad-hoc reporting and graphics are lagging in terms of quality, as mentioned in many user reviews. Also, this platform can prove to be resource-heavy for databases housed on local machines, especially when performing batch update jobs. In addition to inflexible pricing plans and the cost of licensing, quite a few necessary add-ons are paid. In summary, QlikView is one of the leading in-memory BI tools available in the market today and rates excellently with users in terms of data aggregation and visualization capabilities; however, buyers should factor in its pricing plans and other limitations when searching for the perfect BI solution for their enterprise.
User reviews of IBM Watson Studio provide valuable insights into its strengths and weaknesses. The platform is lauded for its advanced analytics capabilities, allowing users to conduct in-depth data analysis and modeling. Collaboration features are appreciated for enabling effective teamwork, fostering knowledge sharing among data scientists, analysts, and stakeholders. AutoAI is a standout feature, automating machine learning tasks and making it accessible to users with varying skill levels. Users find the data visualization tools helpful for creating compelling visualizations that communicate insights effectively. Model deployment within the platform simplifies the transition from development to production environments. On the downside, complexity is cited as a drawback, particularly for newcomers to data science. Resource demands for handling large datasets can be challenging for organizations with limited computational resources. The platform's effectiveness is highly dependent on data quality, which can pose issues with inaccurate or incomplete data. Some users note challenges in interpreting highly complex machine learning models, especially in regulated industries where model transparency is crucial. Integration and customization efforts may be complex and require advanced expertise. In comparison to similar products, IBM Watson Studio is often seen as a robust contender, offering a comprehensive suite of data science and machine learning tools. However, the learning curve and resource requirements may be factors for consideration. User reviews reflect a mix of praise for its capabilities and challenges in mastering its advanced functionalities.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...