CrashPlan vs Avamar

How do you plan for a system crash? User reviews of CrashPlan over the last year present a mixed bag, with some praising its strengths while others bemoan its weaknesses. On the upside, CrashPlan is lauded for its robust data resiliency, ensuring quick recovery from various mishaps. Its self-service features, like restores and device migrations, are also appreciated for their convenience. Security is another strong suit, with TLS 1.2 encryption safeguarding data. However, performance issues, particularly slow backup maintenance and restore speeds, are a recurring complaint. The software's Java-based architecture is also criticized for excessive resource consumption and stability concerns. These performance hiccups, coupled with what some perceive as steep pricing, have left some users feeling shortchanged. CrashPlan's differentiating factor lies in its comprehensive approach to data protection, offering a suite of features that cater to both individual and organizational needs. However, its Achilles' heel is undoubtedly its performance, which can make or break the user experience, especially in critical data recovery situations. This inconsistency in performance makes it difficult to pinpoint a specific user group for whom CrashPlan would be a perfect fit. While its comprehensive features might attract tech-savvy users, the performance issues could deter those who prioritize speed and efficiency.

Have you heard the one about the IT manager who wasn't afraid of data loss? Perhaps they used Avamar! Let's find out. Dell Avamar is a data protection software lauded for its robust deduplication technology, which shrinks backup sizes to optimize storage and network resources. Users rave about Avamar's reliability and efficiency, particularly its ability to perform rapid daily full backups and granular recovery. For instance, one user highlighted Avamar's exceptional source-side deduplication, enabling efficient backups for remote sites with minimal bandwidth consumption. Avamar's tight integration with virtualization environments like VMware is another feather in its cap, simplifying data protection for virtualized infrastructures. However, some users find Avamar's reporting tools rudimentary and crave more advanced features. The cost of Avamar is a recurring concern, especially for organizations grappling with large, diverse datasets. While Avamar can integrate with other Dell EMC products for comprehensive disaster recovery, this reliance on additional components might not sit well with everyone. In the ever-evolving landscape of data protection, some users feel Avamar is showing its age, especially when compared to more modern solutions like Dell's own PowerProtect Data Manager. Despite these drawbacks, Avamar remains a solid choice for mid-sized to large enterprises seeking dependable data protection, particularly those heavily invested in Dell's ecosystem.