Our analysts compared Bill.com vs Workday Financial Management based on data from our 400+ point analysis of Accounting Software, user reviews and our own crowdsourced data from our free software selection platform.
Analyst Rating
User Sentiment
among all Accounting Software
Bill.com has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 85% when considering 2020 user reviews from 5 recognized software review sites.
Workday Financial Management has a 'great' User Satisfaction Rating of 84% when considering 324 user reviews from 4 recognized software review sites.
SelectHub research analysts have evaluated Workday Financial Management and concluded it earns best-in-class honors for Budget and Expense Management.
Users highly rate Bill.com's user-friendly interface, time-saving automation features, and excellent customer support. They appreciate the ability to easily track invoices, automate payments, and reconcile bank statements. Compared to other accounting software, Bill.com stands out for its seamless integration with popular business applications and its robust reporting capabilities. These strengths make it a valuable tool for businesses looking to streamline their financial operations and improve efficiency. While Bill.com excels in many areas, users have also noted some limitations. Some users find the software's pricing structure to be higher than competitors, and the lack of advanced inventory management features may be a drawback for businesses with complex inventory needs. Additionally, the software's reliance on an internet connection can be a concern for businesses that require offline access. Overall, Bill.com is an excellent choice for businesses seeking a user-friendly and efficient accounting solution. Its strengths in automation, integration, and reporting make it a valuable tool for streamlining financial operations. However, businesses with advanced inventory management needs or those requiring offline access may need to consider alternative options.
Workday Financial Management (WFM) user reviews paint a mixed picture. While users praise its streamlining capabilities, real-time insights, and global compliance features, they also face challenges with its initial complexity, limited customization, and high costs. Compared to competitors like Oracle NetSuite and SAP Business One, WFM shines in automating manual tasks and offering intuitive dashboards for data-driven decision-making. However, its steeper learning curve and potential integration hurdles can be daunting for smaller firms or those accustomed to simpler systems. Users particularly appreciate WFM's ability to automate journal entries, reconciliations, and financial reporting, freeing up valuable time for analysis and strategic planning. The real-time visibility into financial data with customizable dashboards also empowers users to make proactive decisions and manage cash flow effectively. For global organizations, WFM's support for multi-GAAP compliance, multi-currency transactions, and international tax reporting simplifies operations and streamlines reporting across diverse regions. However, users also highlight WFM's learning curve as a major hurdle, especially for those unfamiliar with its unique interface and terminology. The limited customization options can also be frustrating when specific accounting needs or reporting requirements don't perfectly align with the system's functionalities. Additionally, the high implementation and maintenance costs can be a barrier for smaller organizations, making WFM a better fit for larger enterprises with the resources to invest. Compared to competitors, WFM's strengths lie in its automation capabilities and data-driven insights. Users often find Oracle NetSuite more user-friendly and customizable, while SAP Business One offers better integration with existing systems for some businesses. Ultimately, the choice between WFM and its competitors boils down to individual priorities and needs. If automation, real-time data, and global compliance are top concerns, WFM stands out. However, if ease of use, customization, and cost-effectiveness are paramount, other options might be more suitable.
WE DISTILL IT INTO REAL REQUIREMENTS, COMPARISON REPORTS, PRICE GUIDES and more...